Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '24 at 04:19
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$115
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 70.5
1-Core 164
2-Core 328
98% 188 Pts
4-Core 645
8-Core 995
101% 820 Pts
64-Core 1132
70% 1132 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 8809) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
13% Very poor
Lighting 14.9
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 22.4
12% 17 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 21.3
15% 17.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 481
Write 419
Mixed 27.6
68% 309 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 14.7
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 66.5
DQ Mixed 49.6
59% 107 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
8GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 399
Write 2.7
Mixed 5.7
92% 136 MB/s
4K Read 62.9
4K Mixed 0
350% 31.5 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
44.8% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 14.6
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 15 60 19.4" 1280 720 ACR0334 V206HQL
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback