Cyberpowerpc GamingPC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 443%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 599%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 126%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics368% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive580% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemCyberpowerpc GamingPC  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D91)
Memory85.8 GB free of 96 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '24 at 18:41
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900K-$499
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
126% Outstanding
Memory 75.6
1-Core 237
2-Core 475
133% 262 Pts
4-Core 946
8-Core 1,754
161% 1,350 Pts
64-Core 4349
269% 4349 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 126%
Great: 137%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
368% Outstanding
Lighting 590
Reflection 536
Parallax 719
481% 615 fps
MRender 500
Gravity 537
Splatting 278
342% 438 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 368%
Great: 407%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SFYRD2000G 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3398 4269 4548 5022 5033 3261 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
580% Outstanding
Read 3,166
Write 4785
Mixed 3,367
SusWrite 4255
884% 3,893 MB/s
4K Read 83.4
4K Write 221
4K Mixed 126
406% 144 MB/s
DQ Read 1,850
DQ Write 1,128
DQ Mixed 1,568
1,147% 1,515 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 580%
Great: 614%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH96GX5M2B5600C40 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
177% Outstanding
MC Read 72.4
MC Write 70.3
MC Mixed 68
201% 70.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 48.1
SC Mixed 29.5
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 132%
This bench: 177%
Great: 219%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 9% 11 205 32 144 34" 3440 1369 GBT3400 G34WQC
Typical GamingPC Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 188%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 247%
UFO

System: Cyberpowerpc GamingPC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $890
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback