MSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C96
MotherboardMSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '24 at 17:00
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 3000G-$52
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 52.4
1-Core 94.8
2-Core 160
57% 103 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 258
34% 253 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
4.97% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 7.2
4% 6.77 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 10.4
7% 7.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.97%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 250GB 250GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VA001C81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 114 84 86 113 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 403
Write 388
Mixed 327
SusWrite 92.8
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 26.2
90% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 41.6
62% 117 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X4GF2666C16K4 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
51.9% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 18.3
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 13.8
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM7211 SAMSUNG
Typical A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96) Builds (Compare 1,948 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback