Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GM
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210823
Uptime7.3 Days
Run DateApr 04 '24 at 23:05
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 176
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 338
36% 289 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1391) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.61% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 4.9
3% 4.57 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 6.9
5% 5.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.61%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$74
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1244 870 237 250 262 245 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 1,131
Write 1,414
Mixed 1,255
SusWrite 518
243% 1,080 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 53
175% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 528
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 426
319% 431 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 151%
Great: 295%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
931GB free
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 368 373 379 336 348 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 366
Write 378
Mixed 358
SusWrite 362
83% 366 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 37
123% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 119
130% 217 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.M4FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.6% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18.7
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 62: 0P 5R 10G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
62% 65% 34 199 58 120 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15F4
Typical TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM Builds (Compare 1,215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback