Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics98.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive302% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory56 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211019
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 04 '24 at 18:57
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 90.5
1-Core 157
2-Core 310
101% 186 Pts
4-Core 616
8-Core 1,206
108% 911 Pts
64-Core 1,468
91% 1,468 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
ASRock(1849 5104) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.7% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 200
Parallax 206
101% 177 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 143
Splatting 93.4
94% 117 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
299GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 882 799 809 809 805 809 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
302% Outstanding
Read 2,723
Write 2,443
Mixed 1,897
SusWrite 819
440% 1,971 MB/s
4K Read 70.9
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 95.3
317% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,192
DQ Write 822
DQ Mixed 1,033
764% 1,015 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 302%
Great: 355%
Adata Ultimate SU800 1TB-$100
392GB free
Firmware: Q0922FS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 428 427 427 428 426 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 414
Mixed 390
SusWrite 422
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 43.7
150% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 68.3
DQ Write 87.7
DQ Mixed 0.6
22% 52.2 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 126%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$190
913GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 457 457 457 457 458 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 435
Mixed 445
SusWrite 452
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 59.8
197% 66.8 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 218
164% 221 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 119%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37.4
98% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 31.1
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 40.2
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 211 57 60 31.5" 1280 720 GBT3200 G32QC
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,026 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,023
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback