MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory50.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime14.8 Days
Run DateApr 04 '24 at 15:30
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$240
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 76.2
1-Core 162
2-Core 321
99% 187 Pts
4-Core 622
8-Core 1,118
105% 870 Pts
64-Core 2,136
132% 2,136 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Nvidia(10DE 12FE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 122
Parallax 140
111% 133 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 131
Splatting 110
112% 142 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 76 79 77 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 473
Write 79.7
Mixed 105
SusWrite 77.4
40% 184 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 24
108% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 81.6
DQ Mixed 111
88% 125 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 121%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
907GB free
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1797 1747 1848 1838 1904 1918 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
333% Outstanding
Read 2,300
Write 1,940
Mixed 1,454
SusWrite 1,842
423% 1,884 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 64
246% 95.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,363
DQ Write 1,061
DQ Mixed 1,120
863% 1,181 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 333%
Great: 508%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1924 1981 2001 1938 2022 2003 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
360% Outstanding
Read 2,156
Write 2,026
Mixed 2,113
SusWrite 1,978
466% 2,068 MB/s
4K Read 73.2
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 95
316% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,354
DQ Write 1,089
DQ Mixed 1193
901% 1,212 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 360%
Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C16-32GTZN 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 30.9
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 30.9
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 11 60 27.9" 1280 720 BNQ7949 BenQ EL2870U
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,656 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $879
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback