Alienware ASM201

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlienware ASM201  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0GWM1Y
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200213
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 04 '24 at 04:25
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 101
2-Core 194
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 508
53% 426 Pts
64-Core 481
30% 481 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 85C5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
48.4% Average
Lighting 59
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
48% 59.7 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57DA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 299 385 307 282 232 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 477
Mixed 464
SusWrite 312
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 46.2
152% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 650
DQ Write 391
DQ Mixed 509
382% 517 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 107%
Great: 235%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$74
372GB free
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 389 410 411 389 375 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 330
Write 314
Mixed 336
SusWrite 396
78% 344 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 45.4
143% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 154
167% 281 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FR 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 11.7
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 13.7
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 73.3
54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 43" 1280 720 SNYB105 SONY TV *30
Typical ASM201 Builds (Compare 293 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Alienware ASM201

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback