Acer Aspire A315-510P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-510P  (all builds)
MotherboardADN GardenParty_ADN
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230808
Uptime8 Days
Run DateApr 04 '24 at 02:07
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
44.2% Average
Memory 33.9
1-Core 64.2
2-Core 147
42% 81.8 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 315
42% 314 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1656) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.2% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 5.5
4% 5.8 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 5.2
5% 5.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.2%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PGP4128P-AA 128GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFKBO.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 133 118 122 88 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 758
Write 886
Mixed 357
SusWrite 130
119% 533 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 48.8
118% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 405
DQ Write 375
DQ Mixed 392
293% 390 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.7% Above average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 22.4
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 222
18% 222 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 12: 0P 1R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
12% 27% 22 75 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE07CB
Typical Aspire A315-510P Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-510P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback