Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191017
Uptime8.5 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 23:55
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 58.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 190
64% 117 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 544
54% 438 Pts
64-Core 729
45% 729 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 179
Parallax 181
145% 179 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 155
Splatting 131
128% 160 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 131%
Great: 139%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
250GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 79 90 78 95 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 855
Write 777
Mixed 677
SusWrite 141
137% 612 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 40.8
133% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 662
DQ Write 505
DQ Mixed 272
288% 480 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 110%
Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D26BFSE.16FD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
36.6% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 12.4
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 6.9
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 9 198 56 240 27" 1920 1080 BNQ7F60 ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical TUF B360-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 2,050 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $566
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback