HP All-in-One

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP All-in-One  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8381
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190502
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 20:38
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-9125 RADEON R3, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
33.3% Below average
Memory 57.7
1-Core 40.1
2-Core 58.9
35% 52.2 Pts
4-Core 53.3
8-Core 60.9
8% 57.1 Pts
64-Core 51.1
3% 51.1 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
HP(103C 8381) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 18.50.30.03
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
2.23% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 3.2
2% 3.37 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 5.3
3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.23%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$37
869GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 148 138 145 115 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 99.6
Write 161
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 132
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19% Very poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 5.6
18% 6.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 4.8
14% 5 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 19%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 60 42 60 19.5" 1280 720 HWP4244 HP ALL-in-One
Typical All-in-One Builds (Compare 309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP All-in-One

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback