Biostar A960D+V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar A960D+V2  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 20:30
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 68
1-Core 64.5
2-Core 126
52% 86.2 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 276
31% 242 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 85D7) 2GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1784 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Lighting 34.6
Reflection 36.2
Parallax 34.1
28% 35 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 35
Splatting 24.7
26% 32.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SATA III SSD 120GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 11 39 37 42 78 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.8% Poor
Read 226
Write 206
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 46.2
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 11.3
28% 8.87 MB/s
DQ Read 28.3
DQ Write 55.5
DQ Mixed 21.3
22% 35 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
177GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 130 135 128 128 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 119
Write 109
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 131
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
228% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$21
300GB free
Firmware: 02.03E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 18 50 39 40 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 75.9
Write 79.9
Mixed 55.2
SusWrite 51.2
48% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8F CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
27.6% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 7.6
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2402 24G2W1G4
Typical A960D+V2 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar A960D+V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $227
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback