Asus G11CD-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus G11CD-K  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G11CD-K
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170731
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 20:29
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$135
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 91
1-Core 122
2-Core 235
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 657
66% 535 Pts
64-Core 660
41% 660 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-6GB
Gigabyte(1458 412F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.4% Above average
Lighting 73.3
Reflection 71.6
Parallax 71.2
60% 72 fps
MRender 63.4
Gravity 63.6
Splatting 57.8
50% 61.6 fps
Poor: 54%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30200P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 85 75 65 60 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 425
Write 95.5
Mixed 162
SusWrite 75.4
41% 189 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 17.1
105% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 123
122% 200 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 75%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$37
424GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 107 117 115 116 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 163
Write 169
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 114
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
76.5% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 22.2
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 23.5
68% 24 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 55 60 31.5" 1280 720 AOC3201 32G1WG4
Typical G11CD-K Builds (Compare 1,788 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus G11CD-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback