To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 18:56
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 168
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 323
43% 324 Pts
64-Core 321
20% 321 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.18% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 1.2
3% 3.4 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 3.4
3% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN07886
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 462
Write 425
Mixed 398
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 38.6
135% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 187
150% 206 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.1% Average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.5
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 13.1
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 18.7" 1280 720 LEN0A14 LEN D186wA
Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 58%
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback