Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 18:55
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$289
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 95.8
1-Core 125
2-Core 248
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 885
83% 692 Pts
64-Core 1,183
73% 1,183 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6750-XT
Sapphire(1DA2 E465) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 141
Reflection 140
Parallax 324
115% 202 fps
MRender 244
Gravity 155
Splatting 215
168% 204 fps
Poor: 124%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
579GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1718 807 833 902 885 783 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 2,030
Write 3,403
Mixed 724
SusWrite 988
402% 1,786 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 95
4K Mixed 46.8
166% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 714
DQ Write 508
DQ Mixed 621
461% 614 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 220%
Great: 486%
Nvme CT2000P3 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: P9CR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3676 3664 3684 3611 3697 3694 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
410% Outstanding
Read 1,938
Write 3,825
Mixed 2,445
SusWrite 3,671
677% 2,970 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 76
255% 92.1 MB/s
DQ Read 736
DQ Write 586
DQ Mixed 640
484% 654 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 410%
Great: 519%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 10TB
963GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 182 182 182 182 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 167
Mixed 94.1
SusWrite 182
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.2
251% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C17 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 58.3
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 45.4
125% 43.6 GB/s
SC Read 30.6
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 41.8
95% 33.1 GB/s
Latency 53.3
75% 53.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 120%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 75 34.1" 2560 1057 GSM76F9 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,980 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $866
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback