Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-15M2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star Raider GE68HX 13VF
MotherboardMSI MS-15M2  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 18:53
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 75.3
1-Core 196
2-Core 393
114% 222 Pts
4-Core 756
8-Core 1,462
132% 1,109 Pts
64-Core 2,643
164% 2,643 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 109%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 13CC) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4314
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.95% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 11.6
8% 12.5 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 13
Splatting 11.1
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.95%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2400_MTFDKBA1T0QFM 1TB
887GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA001 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,774
Write 2,830
Mixed 1,720
474% 2,108 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 224
4K Mixed 37.5
256% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,534
DQ Write 907
DQ Mixed 1,091
847% 1,177 MB/s
Poor: 151% Great: 356%
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU 512GB
453GB free
Firmware: HXC70W1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,154
Write 1,825
Mixed 1,620
415% 1,866 MB/s
4K Read 60.7
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 79.1
266% 92.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,632
DQ Write 962
DQ Mixed 1,154
898% 1,250 MB/s
Poor: 95% Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 57.6
MC Write 44.5
MC Mixed 48.2
143% 50.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 44.8
SC Mixed 25.6
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 131%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 240 16" 1280 720 AUO26A9
Typical MS-15M2 Builds (Compare 213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-15M2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback