Asrock A320M/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics67.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M/ac  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 18:52
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 72.2
1-Core 136
2-Core 263
85% 157 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 799
78% 640 Pts
64-Core 967
60% 967 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$234
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.3% Good
Lighting 83.9
Reflection 83.3
Parallax 76.1
68% 81.1 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 73.9
Splatting 66.2
65% 81.9 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda Q5 ZP500CV30001 500GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU5SH017
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 69 252 89 33 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 1,040
Write 1,008
Mixed 935
SusWrite 104
173% 772 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 53.5
186% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 324
235% 301 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 119%
Great: 205%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
783GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 138 141 141 148 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 123
Write 147
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 142
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
97% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.7% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 26.9
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 26.1
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 96.2
42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 43: 0P 5R 6G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
43% 25% 44 217 58 60 24" 1280 720 AUS24A1 VG245
Typical A320M/ac Builds (Compare 1,779 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock A320M/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $321
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback