Asrock B550M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock B550M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 18:51
Run Duration99 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$117
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 164
2-Core 324
104% 193 Pts
4-Core 628
8-Core 951
98% 790 Pts
64-Core 1,122
69% 1,122 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 104%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700
XFX(1EAE 661A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 10GB, Driver: 24.2.1
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 112
Reflection 132
Parallax 220
91% 155 fps
MRender 213
Gravity 119
Splatting 192
144% 174 fps
Poor: 106%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,581
Write 2,784
Mixed 2,742
606% 2,702 MB/s
4K Read 60.4
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 73.4
236% 76.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,177
DQ Write 734
DQ Mixed 1,019
742% 977 MB/s
Poor: 266% Great: 477%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
22GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 513
Write 484
Mixed 444
107% 480 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 52.8
171% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 374
281% 376 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 45.5
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 41.8
109% 38.1 GB/s
SC Read 32.1
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 43.3
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 107%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 28: 0P 2R 4G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
28% 18% 65 210 57 144 21.7" 1920 1009 ACR074D
Typical B550M Pro4 Builds (Compare 2,929 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock B550M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $472
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback