Alienware Aurora R13

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAlienware Aurora R13  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0C92D0
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231214
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 18:41
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700KF-$189
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 72.9
1-Core 200
2-Core 400
115% 224 Pts
4-Core 793
8-Core 1,516
137% 1,155 Pts
64-Core 2,331
144% 2,331 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 111%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$435
Dell(1028 C890) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 551.86
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
115% Outstanding
Lighting 99.4
Reflection 256
Parallax 290
81% 215 fps
MRender 323
Gravity 234
Splatting 174
191% 243 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 115%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON SKC3000D2048G 2TB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1579 817 809 699 681 709 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 942
Write 2,584
Mixed 1,012
SusWrite 882
308% 1,355 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 227
4K Mixed 73.3
270% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,351
DQ Write 1,135
DQ Mixed 1,138
881% 1,208 MB/s
Poor: 225%
This bench: 230%
Great: 611%
WDC WD6003FRYZ-01F0DB0 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 220 211 219 219 209 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 200
Write 199
Mixed 104
SusWrite 216
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 1.2
9% 4.1 MB/s
DQ Read 4.1
DQ Write 5.4
DQ Mixed 4.4
3% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 28%
Nvme WD_BLACK SN770 2TB
768GB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3877 3983 3695 3888 3863 3881 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
579% Outstanding
Read 4408
Write 4164
Mixed 2,704
SusWrite 3,864
851% 3,785 MB/s
4K Read 69.7
4K Write 233
4K Mixed 89.8
344% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 1,564
DQ Write 1229
DQ Mixed 1,336
1,016% 1,376 MB/s
Poor: 240%
This bench: 579%
Great: 630%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KF548C38-8 80AD000080AD HMCG66MEBUA081N 0198000080CE KF548C38-8 80AD000080AD HMCG66MEBUA081N 32GB
4800, 4800, 4800, 4800 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
132% Outstanding
MC Read 51.6
MC Write 52.5
MC Mixed 48
145% 50.7 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 45.6
SC Mixed 28
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 95.4
42% 95.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 100 34.1" 1280 720 DELA0FA Dell AW3418DW
Typical Aurora R13 Builds (Compare 898 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 214%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 251%
UFO

System: Alienware Aurora R13

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $715
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback