Gateway FX6831

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics74.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGateway FX6831  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway H57M01
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 18:38
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 73.3
2-Core 127
61% 96.4 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 353
38% 302 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.3% Very good
Lighting 90.1
Reflection 104
Parallax 93.8
73% 95.9 fps
MRender 90
Gravity 94.4
Splatting 93.4
76% 92.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$90
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 110 109 128 133 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 133
Write 143
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 121
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$90
2TB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 114 132 128 134 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 136
Write 119
Mixed 60
SusWrite 128
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$44
1TB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 107 122 121 121 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 100
Write 91.7
Mixed 55
SusWrite 117
67% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273BH1-CH9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
40.8% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12.9
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 12.7
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 120 48.9" 1280 720 SAM0E5D C49HG9x
Typical FX6831 Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Gateway FX6831

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback