HP ProBook 645 G4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive75.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 645 G4  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8401
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230329
Uptime27.2 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 18:37
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U w/ Radeon Vega Mobile Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 55.3
1-Core 85.6
2-Core 183
59% 108 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 361
49% 365 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 6 (Ryzen iGPU)
HP(103C 8401) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.40.16
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
5.94% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 9.6
6% 8.23 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 9.2
Splatting 8.5
6% 7.87 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.94%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$40
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR045
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 291 344 355 318 258 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 359
Write 390
Mixed 358
SusWrite 311
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 29.1
107% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 145
126% 189 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8MD-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.5% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 7.8
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14C3
Typical ProBook 645 G4 Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 645 G4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback