Asus Z9PE-D16-10G Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemAsus Z9PE-D16-10G Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PE-D16-10G Series
Memory10.1 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJan 12 '18 at 04:55
Run Duration433 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 87.3
2-Core 175
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 690
61% 519 Pts
64-Core 1767
109% 1767 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI MR9271-8i 240GB
140GB free
Firmware: 3.46
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
LSI MR9271-8i 240GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.46
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
LSI MR9271-8i 240GB
110GB free
Firmware: 3.46
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
LSI MR9271-8i 149GB
49GB free
Firmware: 3.46
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
46GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 463
Write 217
Mixed 189
63% 290 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 6.26
53% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 7.19
44% 101 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 78%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
699GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
5.26% Terrible
Read 27.6
Write 2.88
Mixed 6.37
11% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.17
4K Mixed 0.05
9% 0.21 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 5.26%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSF2G72PZ-1G9 36JSF2G72PZ-1G9 CompuStocx (CSX CompuStocx (CSX CompuStocx (CSX CompuStocx (CSX 36JSF2G72PZ-1G9 36JSF2G72PZ-1G9 96GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
16384, 16384, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.7% Above average
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 19.4
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 6.6
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PE-D16-10G Series Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Asus Z9PE-D16-10G Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback