Asrock A620M-HDV/M.2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsrock A620M-HDV/M.2  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock A620M-HDV/M.2
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230426
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 18:01
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 71.8
1-Core 183
2-Core 353
105% 202 Pts
4-Core 690
8-Core 1,111
110% 900 Pts
64-Core 1,296
80% 1,296 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 100%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 119
Parallax 156
135% 147 fps
MRender 201
Gravity 132
Splatting 107
115% 147 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 123%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM710 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9742
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,726
Write 4,026
Mixed 2,782
784% 3,511 MB/s
4K Read 63.7
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 95.5
334% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 1,817
DQ Write 1213
DQ Mixed 1,226
993% 1,419 MB/s
Poor: 266% Great: 565%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G48C40U5.M8A1 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 28.1
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 29.6
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 26.3
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 0P 1R 2G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 23% 43 216 57 60 24.1" 1280 720 DELA0B8 DELL U2415
Typical A620M-HDV/M.2 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 188%
UFO

System: Asrock A620M-HDV/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $701
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback