Asus P8H61-M LX PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 16:58
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 93
2-Core 182
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 352
47% 352 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
MSI(1462 2843) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Lighting 32
Reflection 49.4
Parallax 43.8
26% 41.7 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 40.8
Splatting 32.7
30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JAJS600M256C 256GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0506A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 67 5.7 9.7 71 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 362
Write 33.5
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 32.4
24% 111 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.4
47% 10.3 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 98%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
440GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 82 103 96 103 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 140
Write 98.5
Mixed 64.6
SusWrite 99.3
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-034.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
59.2% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 18.3
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 17.2
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 24" 1280 720 BNQ78A7 BenQ GL2450H
Typical P8H61-M LX PLUS Builds (Compare 160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $162
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback