Asus B85M-GAMER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics61.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardAsus B85M-GAMER  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150420
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 16:45
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 89.6
1-Core 115
2-Core 237
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 659
69% 551 Pts
64-Core 654
40% 654 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.7% Good
Lighting 76.3
Reflection 123
Parallax 75.7
62% 91.7 fps
MRender 71.6
Gravity 76.9
Splatting 74.2
61% 74.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 788 392 442 406 406 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
612GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 193 192 192 193 194 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 88.4
Write 126
Mixed 29
SusWrite 192
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.4
424% 3 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.7% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 10.2
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 10.6
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 71: 0P 5R 10G 16B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
69% 48% 60 341 19 144 24.5" 1920 1080 BNQ7F81 ZOWIE XL LCD
History: Score 69: 0P 5R 10G 14B | Score 71: 0P 5R 10G 16B
Typical B85M-GAMER Builds (Compare 506 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus B85M-GAMER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $421
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback