Acer Aspire TC-895

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Acer Aspire TC-895 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire TC-895
Memory	4.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210621
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 03 '24 at 13:17
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400-$124 71,804 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Memory 82.9 1-Core 122 2-Core 240 82% 148 Pts	4-Core 444 8-Core 736 72% 590 Pts	64-Core 969 60% 969 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.23 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.3% Poor	Lighting 35.8 Reflection 39.7 Parallax 37 29% 37.5 fps	MRender 36.9 Gravity 37.2 Splatting 26.4 27% 33.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN520 SDA 512GB 2,949 User benchmarks, average bench 169% 160GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 608 257 271 303 258 272 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	152% Outstanding	Read 943 Write 1203 Mixed 1,158 SusWrite 328 205% 908 MB/s	4K Read 41.4 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 59.3 201% 73 MB/s	DQ Read 824 DQ Write 621 DQ Mixed 710 534% 718 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 152% Great: 203%
ADATA NH03 2TB 128 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1.5TB free, PID a03a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 117 Write 107 Mixed 89.4 131% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4U9S8HJ-8 ACR26D4U9S1KA-4 12GB 278 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	57.4% Above average	MC Read 22.2 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 16 57% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 17 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 69.6 58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 68%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	191	12	60	31.5"	2560 1369	DELD107 DELL S3221QS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire TC-895 Builds (Compare 1,175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-895

CPU
Core i5-10400Intel $124Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	604x
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	270x
Core i3-10100Intel $91Bench 80%, 24,563 samples	181x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 37,718 samples	479x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	167x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	161x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 512GBKingstonBench 126%, 5,630 samples	227x
MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GBSamsungBench 136%, 14,873 samples	139x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples	76x

RAM
ACR26D4U9S8HJ-8 ACR26D4U9S1KA-4 12GBKingstonBench 57%, 278 samples	110x
AM2P32NC8W1-BCFS 1x8GBAdataBench 34%, 1,264 samples	99x
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 7,517 samples	74x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $124

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16