Today's hottest deals

Asus Z170-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z170-P  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime10.4 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 10:30
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$127
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 84.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 225
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 658
65% 533 Pts
64-Core 650
40% 650 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.9% Below average
Lighting 41.8
Reflection 40.6
Parallax 38.6
34% 40.3 fps
MRender 36.8
Gravity 40.5
Splatting 27.2
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 128 128 127 127 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 476
Write 131
Mixed 182
SusWrite 130
50% 230 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 31.4
134% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 153
139% 220 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 128%
Transcend SSD370S 128GB-$63
115GB free
Firmware: O0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 194 196 196 196 197 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 480
Write 197
Mixed 240
SusWrite 195
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 37.8
128% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 42.5
DQ Mixed 175
124% 164 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 90%
Toshiba HDWU120 2TB
790GB free
Firmware: MZ4OACK0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 146 145 144 147 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 129
Write 140
Mixed 18
SusWrite 144
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
132% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.6% Good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 20.2
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 17.4
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 31.5" 1280 720 GSM777F LG HDR 4K
Typical Z170-P Builds (Compare 4,450 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-P - $119

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $546
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback