ECT ONE GAMING Premium IN06

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemECT ONE GAMING Premium IN06  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star Z490-A PRO (MS-7C75)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 08:42
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700KF-$220
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 145
2-Core 279
97% 174 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 1,027
94% 790 Pts
64-Core 1,514
94% 1,514 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 100%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$280
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 184
Reflection 177
Parallax 166
150% 176 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 137
Splatting 118
118% 149 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 131%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
678GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1433 509 376 538 419 409 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 2051
Write 2,047
Mixed 1,838
SusWrite 614
367% 1,638 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 59.4
239% 88.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,254
DQ Write 816
DQ Mixed 1,026
768% 1,032 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 238%
Great: 300%
WDC WD40EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 160 160 162 162 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
20% Very poor
Read 158
Write 162
Mixed 79.9
SusWrite 160
32% 140 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 0.9
13% 5.43 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 11.4
DQ Mixed 0.8
2% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20%
Great: 39%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
12GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 8.9 14 17 17 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1,937
Write 0.2
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 14.2
325% 488 MB/s
4K Read 138
4K Mixed 0
765% 68.8 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3600 C18 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 40.1
MC Mixed 27.9
102% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 44.2
SC Mixed 30.6
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 52.8
76% 52.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 101%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 30 34" 1280 720 AOC3402 U34G2G4R3
Typical ONE GAMING Premium IN06 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine

System: ECT ONE GAMING Premium IN06

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $603
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback