Dell XPS 17 9720

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive323% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemDell XPS 17 9720  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0KNF8J
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2400 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240202
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 08:37
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 69.3
1-Core 118
2-Core 219
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 590
65% 512 Pts
64-Core 1,473
91% 1,473 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Dell(1028 0AFF) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Lighting 22.1
Reflection 25.9
Parallax 25.1
18% 24.4 fps
MRender 22.1
Gravity 32.1
Splatting 20.9
20% 25 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PC801 SK hynix 1TB
754GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51003141 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1268 1364 1338 1548 1504 1581 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
323% Outstanding
Read 3,277
Write 2,221
Mixed 1,915
SusWrite 1,434
493% 2,212 MB/s
4K Read 60.4
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 64.7
244% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 912
DQ Write 415
DQ Mixed 752
534% 693 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 323%
Great: 499%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMCG66MEBSA092N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 51
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 43.5
117% 40.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 20.7
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 97.4
41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 106%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 0P 0R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 15% 33 213 56 60 17" 1536 960 SHP1517
Typical XPS 17 9720 Builds (Compare 808 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Dell XPS 17 9720

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback