MSI PRO H610M-E DDR4 (MS-7D48)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D48
MotherboardMSI PRO H610M-E DDR4 (MS-7D48)  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220906
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 06:42
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400-$146
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 78.8
1-Core 176
2-Core 294
100% 183 Pts
4-Core 535
8-Core 962
90% 748 Pts
64-Core 1,177
73% 1,177 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
MSI(1462 3961) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
151% Outstanding
Lighting 176
Reflection 170
Parallax 384
143% 243 fps
MRender 314
Gravity 185
Splatting 248
203% 249 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 151%
Great: 153%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS2241 500GB SSD
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS224C10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 56 54 50 36 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 1,772
Write 1,626
Mixed 883
SusWrite 77
242% 1,090 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 1.6
67% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 512
DQ Write 56.7
DQ Mixed 84.4
112% 218 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 106%
Great: 306%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
PNY Inc 8GBF1X08RHLL42-135-K 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 35.1
106% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 39
SC Mixed 27.5
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 102%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 165 24.3" 1920 1009 AOP0912 24MV1Y P
Typical PRO H610M-E DDR4 (MS-7D48) Builds (Compare 1,989 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI PRO H610M-E DDR4 (MS-7D48)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback