User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics37.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-QD4
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221010
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 06:22
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 90
2-Core 165
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 595
55% 459 Pts
64-Core 834
52% 834 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.3% Below average
Lighting 43
Reflection 58.6
Parallax 66.2
35% 55.9 fps
MRender 58.9
Gravity 53.1
Splatting 44.1
42% 52 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 50 2.8 3.2 143 33 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 420
Write 271
Mixed 220
SusWrite 71.8
54% 246 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 26.6
4K Mixed 15.2
57% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 86.7
DQ Mixed 27
40% 76.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 56%
3 1TB SSD 1TB
1GB free
Firmware: V1220B0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 248
Write 132
Mixed 188
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 18.7
83% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 54.9
64% 111 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 98%
Kingdian S280 240GB
174GB free
Firmware: R1001A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 629 534 134 97 79 104 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55% Above average
MC Read 24
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 17.2
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 15.2
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 56 75 21.7" 1920 1017 GSM5BFB LG FULL HD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback