Dell OptiPlex 9020

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell OptiPlex 9020
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 9020  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180625
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 05:42
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 89.6
2-Core 185
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 526
52% 427 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Nvidia(10DE 21C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.86
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52% Above average
Lighting 69.6
Reflection 53.4
Parallax 52.4
57% 58.5 fps
MRender 67.8
Gravity 52.3
Splatting 42
43% 54 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 52%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst Elite 120GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1123A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 41 50 26 28 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 354
Write 332
Mixed 311
SusWrite 43.3
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 6.6
60% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 27.8
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 13.6
48% 99.1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
215GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 93 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 93.3
Write 89.8
Mixed 53.1
SusWrite 93.8
60% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
M378B1G73AH0-K0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.9% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.3
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 27: 0P 2R 4G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
27% 15% 72 531 442 144 27" 1280 720 ACR075C VG270 V
Typical OptiPlex 9020 Builds (Compare 10,724 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 9020

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback