Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16R4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 9SCXR
MotherboardMSI MS-16R4  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201105
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 03:44
Run Duration84 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 116
2-Core 220
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 494
54% 429 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 12BD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.36% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 6.9
5% 6.27 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9.9
6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.36%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AI1 512GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.8
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 64.5
Write 852
Mixed 63.9
75% 327 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 1.6
48% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 291
195% 238 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI32D4S2S1ME-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.8% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 11.2
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 15.5" 1536 801 AUO21ED
Typical MS-16R4 Builds (Compare 3,080 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback