Acer Nitro N50-610

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro N50-610  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Nitro N50-610
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200713
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 03:42
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$94
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 83.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 239
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 763
76% 621 Pts
64-Core 963
60% 963 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Sapphire(174B A548) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42% Average
Lighting 54.1
Reflection 57.4
Parallax 48.7
44% 53.4 fps
MRender 42.8
Gravity 49.6
Splatting 46.1
38% 46.2 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 904 489 484 491 490 491 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 7,616
Write 6378
Mixed 6,641
SusWrite 558
1,182% 5,298 MB/s
4K Read 435
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 249
1,079% 292 MB/s
DQ Read 1,094
DQ Write 583
DQ Mixed 712
563% 796 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 132%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
25GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 179
Write 9.5
Mixed 18.4
54% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
42% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%
WD My Passport 0830 1TB
160GB free, PID 0830
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 91.7
Write 65.8
Mixed 44
79% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A1K43DB2-CTD 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
78.5% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 24.5
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 23.4
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 72.3" 1280 720 SNYEF03 SONY TV
Typical Nitro N50-610 Builds (Compare 3,368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: Acer Nitro N50-610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $249
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback