HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8615
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191115
Uptime29.1 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 03:13
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
37% Below average
Memory 36.1
1-Core 46
2-Core 144
39% 75.5 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 283
31% 244 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
HP(103C 8615) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.28
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
4.85% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 9.4
4% 7.47 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 8.5
6% 7.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.85%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g KIOXIA 256GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 185 197 194 435 215 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 545
Write 429
Mixed 478
SusWrite 227
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 49.5
161% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 604
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 328
271% 399 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 105%
Great: 152%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P26KC8T1-BXPS 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.1% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 195
20% 195 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 62 45 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO21ED
Typical Pavilion Laptop 15-cw1xxx Builds (Compare 694 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback