Asrock A520M-HVS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics90.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A520M-HVS  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220224
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 03:13
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$136
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 80.7
1-Core 168
2-Core 334
103% 194 Pts
4-Core 621
8-Core 930
96% 775 Pts
64-Core 1,078
67% 1,078 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
Nvidia(10DE 17AE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.3% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 90.9
Parallax 113
99% 108 fps
MRender 87.6
Gravity 98.1
Splatting 84.9
73% 90.2 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 100%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3E00101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 80 102 81 91 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 463
Write 382
Mixed 121
SusWrite 109
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 19.8
130% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 110
124% 207 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905625-004.A03LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 36.8
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 35.6
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 20" 1280 720 GSM4EE1 20EN33
Typical A520M-HVS Builds (Compare 525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M-HVS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback