PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 162% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 92.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z220 CMT Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1790 |
Memory | 25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190610 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 02 '24 at 22:15 |
Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 20% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1245 V2-$368
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
63.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
162%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$180
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 324 382 387 378 342 MB/s
|
92.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung SM841N mSATA 128GB
63GB free
Firmware: DXM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 13 13 15 12 12 MB/s
|
10.9%
Very poor
|
|||
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
2GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT41GU7AFR8C-PB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
50.6%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 70 | 58 | 120 | 48.8" | 5120 1377 | SAM71AC LS49AG95 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 616x |
Xeon E3-1225 V2Intel $248Bench 70%, 2,869 samples | 158x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 108x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 101x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 73x |
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 71x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $384 |