Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H81M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateApr 02 '24 at 19:48
Run Duration441 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
44.4% Average
Memory 79
1-Core 64.5
2-Core 69.3
49% 70.9 Pts
4-Core 62
8-Core 53.3
8% 57.7 Pts
64-Core 73
4% 73 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 8619) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.6% Average
Lighting 62.8
Reflection 72
Parallax 63
51% 65.9 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 71.1
Splatting 66.9
41% 46 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 82 30 57 45 30 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.6% Below average
Read 229
Write 213
Mixed 151
SusWrite 55
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 24.8
41% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 138
105% 143 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 85%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$27
225GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 82 76 81 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
45% Average
Read 81.9
Write 76.2
Mixed 13.6
SusWrite 75.3
44% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45%
Great: 87%
WD Green 500GB (2012)
313GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 88 85 86 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 107
Write 105
Mixed 88.4
SusWrite 82.5
71% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.9
197% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 79%
SAMSUNG HD502HI 500GB
413GB free, PID 0577
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 33 30 31 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 34.7
Write 35.5
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 29.5
44% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
71% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
32% Below average
MC Read 8
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 9.5
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 3.1
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 202 10 60 54.6" 1280 720 SAM0C26 SAMSUNG
Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,865 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $345
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback