PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding. |
Graphics | 242% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 464% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7E12 |
Motherboard | MSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12) (all builds) |
Memory | 49.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20230220 |
Uptime | 11 Days |
Run Date | Apr 02 '24 at 19:31 |
Run Duration | 205 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
120%
Outstanding
|
125% 240 Pts
|
137% 1,131 Pts
|
177% 2,860 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$440
Nvidia(10DE 17AF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
242%
Outstanding
|
288% 248 fps
|
255% 328 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$155
547GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4654 3093 1662 1660 1682 1659 MB/s
|
464%
Outstanding
|
787% 3,476 MB/s
|
378% 143 MB/s
|
1,247% 1,667 MB/s
|
![]() PNY CS900 500GB SSD
466GB free
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 451 137 106 106 109 MB/s
|
98.3%
Outstanding
|
84% 376 MB/s
|
166% 58.9 MB/s
|
196% 286 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SS22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 121 122 121 126 122 MB/s
|
58.7%
Above average
|
66% 90.2 MB/s
|
203% 2.07 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown F5-6000J3040G32G 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
173%
Outstanding
|
179% 62.7 GB/s
|
165% 57.7 GB/s
|
56% 71.9 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 37 | 13 | 75 | 27" | 1280 720 | VTK2733 GFI27DBXA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Ryzen 7 7800X3DAMD $419Bench 117%, 5,678 samples | 144x |
Ryzen 9 7950X3DAMD $542Bench 120%, 2,571 samples | 28x |
Ryzen 9 7900XAMD $338Bench 113%, 2,433 samples | 15x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RTX 4090Nvidia $1,717Bench 370%, 37,290 samples | 28x |
RTX 4080Nvidia $1,000Bench 290%, 22,998 samples | 26x |
RTX 4080-S (Super)Nvidia $960Bench 300%, 10,225 samples | 23x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $2,391 |