Asrock A320M-HD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics85.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HD  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 02 '24 at 18:52
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 200GE-$52
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Memory 62.4
1-Core 64.8
2-Core 142
52% 89.6 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 229
30% 228 Pts
64-Core 225
14% 225 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
ASRock(1849 5217) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.4% Excellent
Lighting 82.9
Reflection 131
Parallax 162
68% 125 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 89.2
Splatting 156
120% 147 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAJ20104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 85 40 49 48 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 481
Write 419
Mixed 407
SusWrite 67.6
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 29.9
127% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 87.3
89% 144 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 100%
Toshiba HDWD105 500GB-$49
316GB free
Firmware: MS1OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 153 162 152 149 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 126
Write 151
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 152
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16/8G KHX2400C15/8G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
76.8% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 26.5
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 20.7
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 20 60 18.5" 1280 720 GSM5ACB LG HD
Typical A320M-HD Builds (Compare 730 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback