HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '24 at 16:15
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590S-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 180
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 334
44% 333 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 645
Nvidia(10DE 1029) 1GB
CLim: 823 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 474.64
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
9.27% Terrible
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 12.4
Parallax 13.7
9% 12.2 fps
MRender 14.5
Gravity 13.8
Splatting 11.4
11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.27%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
VTB256GSSD1 256GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2818B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 369 399 268 3.5 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 411
Write 422
Mixed 348
SusWrite 226
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 10.2
93% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 16.4
63% 138 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 76%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
55GB free
Firmware: GH2ZB550
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 67 59 65 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 73.2
Write 40.2
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 65.6
35% 48.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5402-031.A00LF 99U5402-052.A00LF 99U5402-408.A00LF 99U5402-052.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.1% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 16.7
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 18.3
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 25 5 60 21.5" 1280 720 AOC2201 22P1W
Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,686 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback