To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200629
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 02 '24 at 07:59
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3240
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 83.5
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 161
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 160
21% 160 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 6587) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 435 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 1.1
3% 3.93 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1220B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 19 98 36 26 66 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.9% Average
Read 254
Write 228
Mixed 237
SusWrite 57.5
44% 194 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 44.6
4K Mixed 23.8
98% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 99.8
DQ Mixed 0.6
29% 69.8 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
670GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 186 186 183 185 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 163
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 183
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
HP USB Flash Drive 64GB
41GB free, PID 2003
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 9.6 5.8 7.7 7.9 8.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 56.1
Write 22
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 9
23% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.6
47% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix DMT451E6AFR8C-H9 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
24.8% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 7
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 7.6
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 60 18.5" 1280 720 DELD03A DELL E1914H
Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,609 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback