Alienware Aurora R11

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive	179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Alienware Aurora R11 (all builds)
Motherboard	Alienware 0N43JM
Memory	33 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230704
Uptime	10 Days
Run Date	Apr 01 '24 at 23:29
Run Duration	265 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	30%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10900KF-$255 21,040 User benchmarks, average bench 99% U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Memory 78.7 1-Core 140 2-Core 277 89% 165 Pts	4-Core 551 8-Core 941 90% 746 Pts	64-Core 1,485 92% 1,485 Pts
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 106%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Dell(1028 3891) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 551.61 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 274 Reflection 251 Parallax 281 224% 269 fps	Gravity 227 Splatting 171 172% 199 fps
Poor: 163% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PC SN730 NVMe WDC 1024GB 3,901 User benchmarks, average bench 229% 737GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11170012 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1263 942 890 940 1045 954 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	179% Outstanding	Read 1,125 Write 1969 Mixed 1,449 SusWrite 1,006 315% 1,387 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 77.4 4K Mixed 45.6 150% 52.2 MB/s	DQ Read 653 DQ Write 506 DQ Mixed 575 432% 578 MB/s
Poor: 143% ↑ This bench: 179% Great: 332%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$359 9,454 User benchmarks, average bench 117% 1TB free Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 423 437 437 436 435 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	97.8% Outstanding	Read 460 Write 424 Mixed 404 SusWrite 435 97% 431 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 52.7 4K Mixed 37.9 124% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 347 DQ Write 294 DQ Mixed 317 238% 319 MB/s
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 97.8% Great: 137%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$359 9,454 User benchmarks, average bench 117% 1TB free Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 413 425 414 425 422 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	97.5% Outstanding	Read 460 Write 424 Mixed 412 SusWrite 423 97% 430 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 54.2 4K Mixed 39.1 124% 41.1 MB/s	DQ Read 349 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 318 239% 320 MB/s
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 137%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$137 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1.5TB free Firmware: FP1R SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 133 130 136 134 136 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Read 156 Write 160 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 133 93% 128 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 294% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 104%
WD Game Drive 5TB 2,065 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2TB free, PID 262f Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 75 75 74 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	42.1% Average	Read 107 Write 79 Mixed 56.1 SusWrite 74.4 102% 79 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 66%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB 12,029 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 5TB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 173 176 178 174 176 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Read 181 Write 191 Mixed 126 SusWrite 175 228% 168 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 1.7 264% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 98%
WD My Passport 2627 4TB 4,475 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2TB free, PID 2627 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 87 87 85 86 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	43.8% Average	Read 118 Write 83 Mixed 69 SusWrite 86 115% 88.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 121% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A.M16FE 4x16GB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	MC Read 28.7 MC Write 33.8 MC Mixed 26.7 85% 29.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 28.3 SC Mixed 18.2 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 75.1 53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	56	34	144	27"	1280 720	ACR06C1 XV272U

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aurora R11 Builds (Compare 1,481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 171%

UFO

Desktop 97%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 167%

UFO

System: Alienware Aurora R11

CPU
Core i7-10700FIntel $180Bench 93%, 44,448 samples	414x
Core i9-10900KFIntel $255Bench 99%, 21,040 samples	234x
Core i7-10700KFIntel $200Bench 96%, 37,394 samples	218x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	295x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	182x
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	162x

SSD
SN730 NVMe WDC 1024GBPCBench 229%, 3,901 samples	69x
NVMe SK hynix 1TBPc611Bench 201%, 6,137 samples	60x
NVMe KIOXIA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 211%, 4,018 samples	54x

RAM
XW21KG-MIE2 2x8GBUnknownBench 84%, 2,787 samples	196x
XN205T-MIE2 2x16GBUnknownBench 96%, 2,127 samples	183x
XJ69DF-MIE2 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 2,320 samples	144x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $1,090

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16