Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive257% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus WS-C621E-SAGE Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK WS-C621E-SAGE Series
Memory42.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191105
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 01 '24 at 19:35
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4110
CPU1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 85.1
2-Core 162
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 574
52% 439 Pts
64-Core 1,511
94% 1,511 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 155
Reflection 148
Parallax 153
126% 152 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 134
Splatting 115
115% 145 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 118%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 22 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
257% Outstanding
Read 3,114
Write 28.5
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 22
168% 806 MB/s
4K Read 324
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 3.7
497% 110 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 257%
Great: 291%
Avago MR9361-8i 10TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 125 155 157 156 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
892GB free
Firmware: ECFM22.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 226 192 231 253 277 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 1,151
Write 1,882
Mixed 1,283
SusWrite 231
257% 1,137 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 45.2
146% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 612
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 472
349% 468 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 127%
Great: 310%
Seagate ST4000NM0053 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: G00A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 160 160 173 167 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 162
Mixed 104
SusWrite 166
110% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 103%
Seagate ST4000NM0053 4TB
436GB free
Firmware: G00A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 23 17 26 26 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 88.5
Write 42
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 24.1
44% 57.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
44% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 103%
Seagate ST4000NM0053 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: G00A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 36 42 37 38 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 175
Write 55.3
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 39.6
64% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
116% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 103%
Seagate ST4000NM0053 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: G00A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 30 25 26 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 174
Write 60.6
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 25.9
62% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40BB2-CTD 2x31.5GB
2 of 12 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.8% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 7.6
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.1
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 23" 1280 720 DELD0D6 DELL P2319H
Typical WS-C621E-SAGE Series Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 213%
UFO

System: Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $1,304
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback