Casper EXCALIBUR G770

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.67% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemCasper EXCALIBUR G770  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER NLAK 001
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220519
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 01 '24 at 14:49
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 68.5
1-Core 174
2-Core 332
100% 192 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 914
93% 751 Pts
64-Core 1,096
68% 1,096 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Quanta(152D 1384) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5333
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
6.67% Terrible
Lighting 11.4
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 12.9
9% 13.9 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 1
2% 2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.67%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SSD 500GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFA12.b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 657 464 471 450 447 428 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 323
Write 1,177
Mixed 336
SusWrite 486
133% 581 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 57.5
194% 77.8 MB/s
DQ Read 985
DQ Write 969
DQ Mixed 1,156
819% 1,037 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 146%
Great: 240%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FP 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 17
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 14: 0P 0R 3G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
14% 14% 56 189 8 144 15.5" 1536 793 CMN1521
Typical EXCALIBUR G770 Builds (Compare 3,287 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Casper EXCALIBUR G770

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $55
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback