PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock A320M/ac (all builds) |
Memory | 1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200716 |
Uptime | 3.5 Days |
Run Date | Apr 01 '24 at 11:34 |
Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 44% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X Quad-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
|
44.6%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Neo Forza NFS011SA356-6007000 256GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0707B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 31 15 25 34 30 MB/s
|
28.3%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
476GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 102 95 108 108 107 MB/s
|
56.9%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown D12.2361WT.002 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
27.1%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 48 | 15 | 60 | 23.1" | 1280 720 | SAM0710 SMB2330HD |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 530x |
Ryzen 3 3100AMDBench 75%, 50,446 samples | 443x |
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 274x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 198x |
RX 5500-XTAMD $217Bench 51%, 72,993 samples | 179x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 145x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 90% - Excellent | Total price: $309 |