Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190823
Uptime4 Days
Run DateApr 01 '24 at 10:26
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 79
1-Core 105
2-Core 205
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 665
63% 522 Pts
64-Core 1,078
67% 1,078 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.5% Above average
Lighting 65.2
Reflection 62
Parallax 88.6
53% 71.9 fps
MRender 61.6
Gravity 74.3
Splatting 46
48% 60.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 480GB-$42
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900KB3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 432 445 450 450 455 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 375
Write 451
Mixed 354
SusWrite 444
92% 406 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 35.7
130% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 172
160% 243 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2Z3600C20 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 30.2
94% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 25.3
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 30 3 60 27.2" 2560 1440 GSM7707 LG HDR 4K
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,714 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $413
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback