Asus PRIME B550M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B550M-K  (all builds)
Memory18.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '24 at 05:13
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 266
90% 164 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 573
60% 479 Pts
64-Core 734
45% 734 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
124% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 243
Parallax 177
136% 196 fps
MRender 212
Gravity 133
Splatting 108
118% 151 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 124%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 946 442 149 153 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 1,445
Write 1,299
Mixed 1423
SusWrite 341
252% 1,127 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 76.8
255% 89.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,304
DQ Write 997
DQ Mixed 1,075
824% 1,125 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 209%
Great: 295%
CT500BX500SSD1 500GB
66GB free
Firmware: M6CR061
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 412 422 438 404 271 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
62% Good
Read 498
Write 439
Mixed 405
SusWrite 385
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 21.5
4K Mixed 0.9
53% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 48.9
DQ Mixed 0.8
27% 67.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62%
Great: 81%
Lexar 240GB SSD 240GB
13GB free
Firmware: V3.0.9
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 310
Write 401
Mixed 325
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 16.7
70% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 142
125% 181 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 96%
Klevv CRAS C700 RGB M.2 NVMe SSD 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: R0801L4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 996 684 641 694 686 676 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1438
Write 1,256
Mixed 1029
SusWrite 730
249% 1,113 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 62.9
218% 87.3 MB/s
DQ Read 936
DQ Write 1,051
DQ Mixed 302
419% 763 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 214%
Great: 239%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX KF3600C18D4/16GX 24GB
3600, 3600 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
66.6% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 21.7
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 21.4
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 29 144 23.8" 1280 720 AUS2421 ASUS VG249
Typical PRIME B550M-K Builds (Compare 2,768 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B550M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback