Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	3.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-5300U 29,898 User benchmarks, average bench 42% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Memory 17.6 1-Core 40.9 2-Core 66.5 23% 41.7 Pts	4-Core 87.4 8-Core 131 14% 109 Pts	64-Core 153 10% 153 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) 231,498 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 5034) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5144 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	3.64% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 5.8 3% 4.17 fps	MRender 5.6 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 6.4 4% 5.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.64% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
T-force 256GB 256GB 307 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: W0220A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 105 86 85 100 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	36.9% Below average	Read 310 Write 178 Mixed 288 SusWrite 101 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 22.2 4K Mixed 12 48% 16 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 38 DQ Mixed 8.1 26% 58.6 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GB 30,591 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	17.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 6.1 18% 6.3 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4.7 12% 4.17 GB/s	Latency 271 15% 271 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	51	23	60	14"	1280 720	LEN40A1

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-5300UIntelBench 42%, 29,898 samples	11x

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	11x

SSD
128GB SSD 128GBLexarBench 67%, 8,135 samples	1x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	1x
MZ7LN256HCHP-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 81%, 7,649 samples	1x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	5x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,202 samples	2x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	1x