Lenovo 21EB001UUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive96.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemLenovo 21EB001UUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21EB001UUS
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231116
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateApr 01 '24 at 03:16
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
43.9% Average
Memory 51
1-Core 63.8
2-Core 99.3
43% 71.4 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 382
34% 290 Pts
64-Core 644
40% 644 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 50B1) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
8.96% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 14.4
Parallax 21
7% 14.6 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 17.5
13% 15.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.96%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL4-4D256-Q79 256GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5U879
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 234 173 126 149 176 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 1,149
Write 343
Mixed 393
SusWrite 191
113% 519 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 51.7
4K Mixed 9.1
76% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 398
DQ Mixed 240
223% 343 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 212%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE Micron MT40A1G16RC-062E:B 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
46.9% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 16.2
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 16
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 13 60 14" 1296 759 LEN40A9
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback