HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics77.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive249% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 843B
Memory4.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220727
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 31 '24 at 21:49
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 82.9
1-Core 138
2-Core 274
90% 165 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 984
92% 763 Pts
64-Core 984
61% 984 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 92%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
HP(103C 8556) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.34
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.4% Very good
Lighting 98.5
Reflection 97.5
Parallax 90
80% 95.3 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 89.8
Splatting 77.1
72% 89.2 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xg7000-2tb 2280 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN13683
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1040 1683 1868 1902 1795 1999 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 952
Write 2,162
Mixed 1,216
SusWrite 1,714
345% 1,511 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 91.3
4K Mixed 62.6
203% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,116
DQ Write 819
DQ Mixed 891
687% 942 MB/s
Poor: 253%
This bench: 249%
Great: 637%
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB
57GB free
Firmware: SBFMP1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 272 91 94 93 92 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 59%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB-$71
72GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 74 75 76 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 66.1
Write 70.6
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 74.4
47% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD 066D TD48G26S819-VC 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
79.3% Very good
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 23.7
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 24.7
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 27B2
Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-0xxx Builds (Compare 1,117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 123% - Outstanding Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback